In response to the attacks on the united states on september 11, 2001, president bush initiated wars against the taliban in afghanistan, iraq, and terror. Is the war against terror the same as the wars against afghanistan and iraq? identify at least one constitutional issue that is raised by one of the possible differences between the war on terror and the other more traditional wars. 1.explains whether the war against terror the same as the wars against afghanistan and iraq. 2.identifies at least one constitutional issue that is raised by one of the possible differences between the war on terror and the other more traditional wars.

Argumentative Essay on Mass Media

Our writers can help get your essay back on track, take a look at our services to learn more about how we can help. Essay writing service essay marking service place an order the war against terrorism gained momentum after the september 11 attacks in the us. After these attacks, the us government in collaboration with other governments across the world, decided to pursue terrorists in their different strongholds in order to prevent further attacks rodin 44 49. This led to the afghanistan and iraq invasion as well as numerous assassinations and bomb attacks against known terrorist targets. Various governments also took steps to destroy terrorist cells which operated within their jurisdictions. However, these moves have also resulted in the deaths of several civilians who are killed during the course of war against terrorists.

Defending a Dissertation

In some cases, negligence is blamed for the deaths of civilians, and this is especially common in the israeli palestinian conflict and the iraqi war. In addition, the war has resulted in the breach of several human rights across nations, including the right to privacy, occasioned by surveillance of the civilian population it is therefore important to analyze whether the war against terror is justified especially considering its effects to the society at large. The adverse effects caused by the war including causalities to the civilian population and the loss of basic human freedoms necessitate the evaluation of the present war against terror. This paper aims at analyzing the justification of the war against terror, including the proportionality in conduct of this war. The war against terror has been fought for centuries as has been discussed in the introduction stage. Justification of war traces its roots to christianity where god supported various leaders during wars in order to achieve certain noble objectives fiala 29 45. In the war against terror, the consequences of terror and positive outcomes of the war against terror should be evaluated in order to develop justification for war.

It is therefore important to assess some of the famous terrorist attacks which have occurred in recent years. In september 11, 2001, over three thousand people lost their lives and thousands more were injured due to terrorist attacks against the twin towers. In august 1998, over two hundred kenyans and tanzanians lost their lives as a result of simultaneous attacks carried out in both countries' us embassies. In 2004, over three hundred people died after terrorists invaded a school and held children hostage in russia. In addition to these and many more attacks, several leaders have been assassinated by terrorists including several presidents and leaders across almost all countries. The deaths of such leaders have resulted in violent conflicts in some instances, including the 1994 genocide in rwanda caused by the assassination of the rwandan president. The consequences of terror can therefore not be ignored since terror threatens peaceful coexistence and stability in society.

There are many countries which are politically unstable due to terrorist activities and these include iraq and somalia. Without order and stability in society, human beings are unable to live in harmony, which makes it important to fight terror in all societies bruce 34 39. The war against terror is therefore justified since if terror is allowed to continue unabated, the social fabric will be destroyed and humanity may cease to exist in future.

Dissertation Uni Wien Online

This is evident in instances where terrorists gain access to weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear weapons. However, the fight against terror should be conduced with various principles of war under consideration. Basic human rights should also be followed when conducting the war against terror elshtain 8 19.

Rules governing prisoners of war should similarly be followed by agencies which fight terrorism. It is therefore important to assess whether the war against terror follows these principles, with key concern being proportionality in conduct of war. This assessment will enable us to determine whether the war against terror is being conducted humanely, with consideration being to safeguard the civilian population and other non combatants. This principle explains that the injury which troops face in any war should be proportionate to the benefits which are enjoyed from achievement of the military objectives gilbert 100 107. It aims at specifically preventing wars from causing unnecessary suffering and injuries to civilians and other non combatants. The geneva convention explains that civilians should be shielded from any military conflict.

In addition to this, this principle aims at preventing the use of excessive force against enemy forces during war. Although it is generally not clear what is meant by excessive force during war, the principle of proportionality in war aims at ensuring that force during war is proportionate to the objectives which the military aims at achieving. Who wrote this essay request removal example essays in the war against terror the consequences of the war especially to civilians and other non combatants such as relief workers should be weighed against the positive outcomes of the war, in order to determine proportionality.

The adverse consequences are fatalities and injuries occasioned by strikes against terrorist threats, which result in deaths of civilians. As previously stated, this is a common occurrence in several conflicts including that between israel and palestine as well as against us forces and iraqi insurgents. There has been increase in surveillance throughout the world, as a measure of detecting and preventing terrorist strikes. This ranges from use of surveillance cameras to scrutiny of electronic mail and tapping of telephones by anti terrorist agents. Many human rights groups view this as a reversal of gains made by democratic states. The positive outcomes of the war against terrorism include the infiltration and destruction of terrorist cells which operate worldwide.

Essay on Computer And Our Future

Terror groups such as tamil tigers in sri lanka have been completely destroyed due to global efforts in combating terrorism. These efforts have also been successful in preventing a major attack against the us and many other first world countries. It is difficult to quantify these efforts, but the prevention of attacks similar to that which occurred during september 11th, can be seen as a major victory against terrorism. Thousands of lives and billions of dollars worth of infrastructure have been saved as a result of these efforts. One of the greatest benefits of these efforts is the ability to minimize terror and allow normal people conduct their day to day activities without fear of attacks.