Essays for Affirmative Action Text

Jonathan Friesen - Writing Coach

length: 870 words 2.5 double spaced pages affirmative action caught in tale of the two cities of boston, massachusetts and denver, colorado. Since the late 1980s, race and sex based contracting preference programs in the u.s. On february 7th, boston mayor thomas menino announced his plan to eliminate a 15 year old program that required bidders on city construction contracts to subcontract 15% of work to minority owned business enterprises and 5% to women owned firms rubin . That program is being replaced by one that requires bidders to award 20% of subcontracts to local businesses and 20 % to firms with less than 20 employees both categories being race and gender neutral robin. While this mayor announced his new plan, 3 days later on february 10th, the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit went the other direction by overturning a lower court and upholding denver’s constructions m/wbe program in a decade long legal challenge by locally based concrete works of colorado inc. This program initially earmarked 16% of city construction contracts to mbe’s and 12% to wbes robin.

Is minority set aside programs morally acceptable, is one of the questions i will be also answering in this essay and will set out the utilitarian and deontological considerations. I think that mayor thomas menino of boston, new plan shows that affirmative action works robin. I think that was a really good decision to equal out the subcontracts for local businesses and firms with less than 20 employees and the categories being race and gender neutral. This plan really lets you know that the program before was discriminating in a lot of ways against minorities and women.

Programs that have been able to give only 5 % of there subcontracts to women owned business is wrong in every kind of way. The changing of the program by the boston mayor, will give a lot of minority and female business owners hope for the future. Are minority set aside programs morally acceptable? affirmative action programs have been set up in the best interest of minorities. Set aside programs were established as an attempt to bring equality of opportunity for all to reach their dream. The minority set aside programs are morally acceptable if designed with specific rules and regulations.

Law Paper for Ias

These rules have to be set aside not only for minorities but also for the non minority people. People shouldn’t be judged based on the color of their skin but by the content of their character. Racism is something that i believe will never end because of the society we live in. The old school traditionally beliefs is that a woman is suppose to be in the house taking care of the kids and cleaning the house, and handling her husbands needs. As for african americans, we are to violent, lack education, are lazy people when it comes to work, most likely to be a criminal if you are a male. These are some of the silly stereotypes that non minority and major corporation and businesses have. This is the reason why there isn’t a strong presence of women and african americans in the businesses, because this is what people believe.

To me, minority set aside programs are unacceptable, i believe that everyone should be treated equally and have the same opportunity as the next man or woman, no matter what there race, religion and color of their skin is. Are they morally acceptable if the programs only include minorities? same goes for women, are all women programs that only deals with women morally acceptable? i don’t think the world will ever be at a point where the late dr. From the utilitarian view, a well balanced set aside program has positive results to all members of society by giving the opportunity to reach the american dream , thus lowering discrimination on a group that might cause a burden to its members. According to deontologist perspectives, the most qualified person has a right to the job at hand, regardless of the end consequences. As a result, discrimination against such individuals is morally unacceptable, and thus, affirmative action programs provide the steps to ensure this duty, to provide the right for employment if one is qualified, is a morally acceptable action.

Fsu Essay Help 2012

In conclusion, america still has a ways to go when it comes to equality of all people. Some judges are starting to rule in the favor of the minorities and women to make programs equal to everyone and then there at the states that will not change the way they conduct their contracts like in denver. By reading this essay i hope you got an idea how subcontracts are divided up in some american states and why i think minority set aside programs are morally unacceptable. Well if that is a reason for affirmative action why not make it to where all children, regardless of race, who are in the poorer communities reap the benefits of affirmative action. The battle against affirmative action has gone so far as to halting affirmative action in places such as missouri, and even drastically ending affirmative action in california.

Affirmative action was organized with good intentions, however quickly many groups organized to protest affirmative action. It is believed by the foes of affirmative action that affirmative action allowed unqualified minorities admission into the best universities in. It s time to redefine affirmative actionpresidents and citizens of the united states have debated affirmative action for the past forty years. Bill clinton has no doubt affirmative action has worked, but since there is still discrimination there should still be affirmative action 7.

Supporters believe there should be consequences if affirmative action is not followed. Affirmative action research paper is affirmative action still necessary in america today? basically the answer is yes, affirmative action is a fundamental need in american society. Opponents of affirmative action claim that it causes tension between he selected groups, which are the beneficiaries of affirmative action, and the majority groups. In contrast, upholders of affirmative action say companies benefit greatly form the diversity affirmative action programs create for the business community. Affirmative action is one of the most widely debated social policies ever brought about by the american government. The biggest problems facing affirmative action and its constituents are the attitudes of its opposition.

How Do We Write An Argumentative Essay

These attitudes come from a long history of racism that has been passed on from generation to generation. They also stem from lack of education and lack of understanding of the way affirmative action effects the people involved emotionally, financially, and in status. Affirmative action is a policy implemented in order to artificially install equality between white males and minorities over time. Affirmative action cannot be expected to cure the problems of inequality in a matter of years, it will take decades to fix these deep rooted problems of society. The case against affirmative action is a weak one, resting heavily on myth and misunderstanding. This report will outline many of the most popular myths in the case against affirmative action.

The information in this report was derived from public opinion polls done by the government and private sources. Some believe that a large percentage of white workers will lose out if affirmative action stays in place. Another misunderstanding is that jews and asians shared the same hardships, and if they can advance rapidly, why can apos t african americans? another misleading statement is that you can apos t cure discrimination with discrimination. Some think that affirmative action tends to destroy the self esteem of women and african americans. Some people think that affirmative action is just another attempt by liberal democrats at social engineering. Another is that affirmative action was necessary more than thirty years ago, but that minorities now have the same opportunities for advancement educationally and in the workplace.

Microbiology Unknown Research Papers