Source normalized impact per paper snip: 1.259 ℹ source normalized impact per paper snip: 2014: 1.259 snip measures contextual citation impact by weighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field. Scimago journal rank sjr: 1.698 ℹ scimago journal rank sjr: 2014: 1.698 sjr is a prestige metric based on the idea that not all citations are the same. Sjr uses a similar algorithm as the google page rank it provides a quantitative and a qualitative measure of the journal’s impact. Impact factor: 4.408 ℹ impact factor: 2014: 4.408 the impact factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. © thomson reuters journal citation reports 2015 5 year impact factor: 4.409 ℹ five year impact factor: 2014: 4.409 to calculate the five year impact factor, citations are counted in 2014 to the previous five years and divided by the source items published in the previous five years. © journal citation reports 2015, published by thomson reuters several new papers from the group have come out in the past several months. In the journal of urban health we published a paper showing that new yorkers engagement in active transport, either walking or cycling, is positively associated with neighborhood walkability. in a follow up to that work published in the annals of behavioral medicine.

National Technical Honor Society Essay

We showed that engagement in active transport is associated with the presence of outdoor neighborhood cafes, an indicator of street life, and with greater neighborhood safety. We published a commentary in open epidemiology discussing the problems with using odds ratios as a measure of effect in research on obesity and physical activity. for common outcomes such as obesity, odds ratios overestimate effect sizes and in analyses of interaction the use of odds ratios can cause the appearance of spurious interaction effects. length: 1321 words 3.8 double spaced pages most parents remembered hearing about the importance of protecting their children from the sun, yet children are still playing in the sun without sunscreen or protective clothing. Many people these days are not taking skin cancer seriously after knowing its significance. Skin cancer has been a growing problem in the united states and millions of people have suffered from it every year.

The three most common skin cancers are melanoma, basal cell, and squamous cell, which can cause bumps, sores, growths, etc. Skin cancer is a deadly disease with many causes, but the advantage is that it can be prevented. Problem/definition skin cancer is caused by hereditary factors, overexposure to the sun, and weak immune systems.

Skin cancer infotrac.com one reason people tend to get skin cancer is when someone in your family has passed their genes down to you, known as hereditary. For all types of skin cancers, overexposure of the skin to uv radiation in sunlight is the most frequently blamed source of skin cancer. Research suggests that sunburns received early in one’s childhood can lead to skin cancer later in life skin cancer infotrac.com. For example, when someone gets sunburned, you usually don’t know till ten to twenty years after and that’s why people don’t get skin cancer till they reach their twenties. Skin cancer infotrac.com very simply, sunburn and the uv light can damage the skin and lead to skin cancer. Stiefel 14 additionally, having a weak immune system may cause one to develop skin cancer.

Skin cancer infotrac.com for example people who have aids might be at the risk of getting skin cancer. Current events/ studies studies recently done have shown that putting on sunscreen regularly is the most successful way of preventing against skin cancer rather than just putting it on for occasions like the going to the pool or beach. Steven darlington of queensland institute of medical research in australia did a four year study on the development of actinic keratoses, precancerous sun spots, on the skin of 1,621 volunteers around the ages 25 to 74. His results showed him that the people who put on sunscreen regularly had 24% fewer pre cancers than those who put it on just when their going to be outside for a long time. Allen 3 the study… indicates yet again the great potential value of cutaneous sunscreen application, when undertaken conscientiously and carefully, against the now extremely well documented ravages of sunlight in both the short and long term, wrote dr. Discussion of current events/ case study in order to put this issue in greater clarity, the following case study should be examined. In australia, a case was done on 3 groups of patients, those with invasive superficial or nodular melanoma of the trunk, those with similar histological types of melanoma of the head and neck, and those with lentigo maligna melanoma rivers 728.

The patients with melanoma of the head and neck had a history of sun damage and freckling on the faces as a teenager. While the patients with lentigo maligna melanoma tend to freckle and develop solar keratoses. Lastly, patients with melanoma of the trunk are prone to melanocytic naevi moles and less exposed to the sun. Rivers 728 in other words, sunlight has a major role in the development of naevi. Since getting melanoma has so many risks as a young adult, people need to start taking preventing themselves from getting skin cancer. Current event/ expert opinion learning what experts have to say about skin cancer will help us understand why preventing your self from skin cancer is very important. Is known for being a dermatologist in chestnut hill, massachusetts, and a member of the board of the american society for dermatologic surgery.