How to End An Argumentative Essay on Abortion Text

Jonathan Friesen - Writing Coach

Argumentative essay ‘abortion' our world today is full of unsolved, devisive and controversial issues. Most of them relate to our morals, ethics and religion, thus creating a very strong ‘yes' and ‘no', or ‘good' and ‘bad' side. Like the chinese yin and yang sign, abortion has a very prominent ‘black' and ‘white' side but also contains traces of each in the alternating colour. This shows that if you were to come to any kind of conclusion on abortion, there would still be a downside to it, and that is primarily why the world cannot agree on this sensitive and emotional issue. Being female myself, i can understand why a woman would want to have an abortion. Being pregnant and wishing you weren't is probably the worst feeling a woman can have. Knowing that if you brought a child into the world and you didn't want it, or you would have to give it up for adoption is such a disheartening way to start off, and you and the un born child would be so much better off if you were to terminate the pregnancy and wait for a more appropriate time, or in the case of rape, put the past behind you and move on.

When we hear of women having abortions, we seem to automatically think that she wasn't careful enough, or she didn't use contraception. We forget to stop and think about the other possible reasons she may have accidentally become pregnant. Just forgetting to take one pill per packet can reduce it's effectiveness and also taking anti biotics, or being ill can also undermine the way the pill works. Condoms can tear or be forgotten, and emergency contraceptives like the ‘morning after' pill are underprescribed and not readily available. Would it surprise you that over 50% of women getting an abortion in britain used some form of contraception when they got pregnant? this obviously shows that women are having huge problems with using contraception, and something needs to be done about it now. Starting by educating women more on the pill and the way it works, the after effects of abortion, and the risks of having an abortion. People just need to know more about it and have to satisfy specific criteria before having the pregnancy terminated, for instance by interviews with doctor's, given unbiased advice, and consultations with people of their specific religion.

It is hugely important to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies but we have to accept that abortion is a fact of life for many women, ann furedi of the british pregnancy advisory service bpas. In the united states doctor's who administer abortions are being targeted by anti abortion activists and some have actually been murdered. The doctor's are now having to take many precautions including wearing bullet proof vests and pulling blinds and shades down in their homes. One obstetrician gynecologist had to shut down his medical practice after he was terrorized by protesters who had distributed ‘wanted' posters with his photograph, mailed threats to his home and listed his name on a ‘baby butcher's ‘ web site. What makes a person think that just because they feel strongly about an issue it gives them the right to go and kill someone, or harass them till they fear for the safety of their family? in scotland the roman catholic church offered a 12yr old pregnant girl money in the attempt to prevent her from having an abortion.

She was advised by her teachers and a social worker to terminate the pregnancy mainly because of her age and her family's financial position. But her parents were more convinced with the advice given to them by the scottish church's pro life initiative, a program that offers alternatives to abortion. A writer of the tabloid daily mirror argues that offering 12yr olds cash for babies is tantamount to bribery. Abortion is one of the heaviest topics currently discussed in contemporary american politics. Even great philosophers like plato and aristotle weighed in on abortion, arguing its benefits and drawbacks in a democratic society.

Essay on Popular Culture And Ethnicity

In context with today’s abortion laws, this sample argumentative paper highlights why abortion should be illegal and roe v. Wade reversed because ultius does not share or condone any view regarding abortion, we have published a variety of posts that argue both sides of this topic. Whatever your needs and political preferences are, if you would like to buy a custom essay on either side of the abortion argument for your personal use, please give us a call today. Our essay writing services are what helped make us famous and are trusted by thousands of students worldwide! the legality of abortion is a staple topic in contemporary political discourse. Though the supreme court ruled in favor of a woman’s right to choose in its 1973 on roe v wade, the issue remains a contentious topic amongst a wide array of american voters. This is because, while deliberating this case, the supreme court failed to thoroughly perform its duties and, thus, its decision is unfounded.

Due to this failure, the decision ought to be overturned, and abortion should be federally illegal until the court does its due diligence and produces a satisfactory and definitive ruling.

how about a pro life argument based in logic?

it is important to keep in mind that every right claimed by one party implies that a separate party has a corresponding obligation to respect that right. That is to say, if fred has a right to private property, then joe is obliged to keep off of it unless fred gives him permission.

However, joe might object to this he may insist that he too has rights that must be respected. Joe could claim, for example, that he has a right to move around freely and go where he likes and that fred’s exclusive right to property infringes on his own freedom to go where he likes. It is apparent that fred and joe’s respective rights are in conflict if joe is obliged to respect fred’s proprietary rights, then joe’s right to move about as he likes will be hampered.

Call for Paper Management 2014

Conversely, for fred to respect joe’s freedom of movement and travel, then he will have to give up his exclusive right to private property. If corresponding obligations always accompany rights, and these obligations are sometimes incompatible with the rights of other people, as is the case in the example of fred and joe, this gives rise to the problem of determining which right wins out in the end. In the above example, since it is clearly impossible for both fred and joe to exercise the rights they are claiming at the same time, a judge must determine which of the two competing rights is more fundamental or deserving of respect. If it happens that the right to private property is more fundamental than the right to travel, the latter will be limited and fred will be justified in keeping joe off of his land. On the other hand, if the right to travel is found to be more fundamental, then fred’s right to private property will be limited and joe will be able to travel across it if he likes. In other words, when it happens that rights conflict with one another, it is a judge’s job to adjudicate the question of which right is more basic and rule in favor of it.

the right to life is most important

of all the rights that can possibly be claimed, an individual’s right to life is the most fundamental. According to legal philosopher henry shoe, rights of security and subsistence are ‘basic rights’ because they are indispensable for the enjoyment of all other rights wenar. This means that a person’s right to life is a precondition for other rights, like those to private property or movement if one is not free to not be killed, then he or she can’t be free to travel to rome or own a car. Thus if fred’s right to life were ever to conflict with joe’s right to travel, fred’s right would win out and joe’s right would be limited. The right to be secure in one’s life, in other words, cannot be overridden in favor of a competing, less basic right. With respect to the supreme court’s ruling in roe v wade, a woman’s right to an abortion is derived from her right to privacy. According to chief justice blackmun, who wrote the opinion of the court, the right to privacy is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.